I · Research Protocol
Criterion 5 / 20
25%
Analysis of Results and Conclusions
Análisis de Resultados y Conclusiones
We evaluate whether data was analyzed rigorously, results are logically interpreted, and conclusions are supported by evidence rather than personal opinion.
Scoring Breakdown
5
Excellent
- Data analyzed using appropriate tools (statistics, comparisons, graphs)
- Results clearly presented with tables or charts
- Interpretation connects results to hypothesis
- Conclusions are supported by data
- Discusses limitations honestly
4
Good
- Data is analyzed and presented
- Conclusions largely supported by results
- Some visual aids used
- Minor gaps in interpretation
3
Acceptable
- Basic analysis present
- Conclusions exist but partially justified
- Limited use of charts or tables
- Hypothesis result not clearly addressed
2
Insufficient
- Minimal analysis
- Conclusions not derived from data
- Results merely listed without interpretation
- Hypothesis ignored in conclusions
1
Poor
- No analysis performed
- Conclusions are opinions
- No results presented
- Data collection not evident
Common Mistakes
- ✘Writing "I think this is correct because…" instead of "The data shows…"
- ✘Presenting raw data without analysis
- ✘Conclusions that don't address the hypothesis
- ✘Not discussing why results may differ from expectations
Evaluator Focus
- Data-to-conclusion traceability
- Hypothesis resolution
- Use of visual aids
- Acknowledgment of limitations
How to Get 5 Points
- ✔Does every conclusion trace back to specific data?
- ✔Did you confirm or deny your hypothesis based on results?
- ✔Did you use charts, graphs, or statistical tools?
- ✔Did you discuss limitations and possible improvements?
Universal Scoring Scale
1
Poor
2
Insufficient
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
←Back to Rubric
Criterion 5 of 20