I · Research Protocol
Criterion 4 / 20
25%
Methodological Rigor
Rigor Metodológico
We assess whether the research method is well-defined, appropriate for the problem, includes control measures, and could be replicated by another researcher.
Scoring Breakdown
5
Excellent
- Variables (independent, dependent, controlled) are clearly defined
- Method is appropriate for the type of problem
- Sample size and selection criteria are justified
- Design is replicable by another researcher
- Control measures minimize bias
4
Good
- Variables defined with minor gaps
- Methodology is appropriate
- Sample size mentioned
- Mostly replicable
- Basic control measures described
3
Acceptable
- Some variables defined
- Method described but not fully justified
- Limited reproducibility
- Some steps unclear
2
Insufficient
- Variables not defined
- Method is improvised or incomplete
- Cannot be replicated
- No control measures
1
Poor
- No methodology described
- Process is entirely unclear
- No scientific basis
- Random or anecdotal approach
Common Mistakes
- ✘Not distinguishing between dependent and independent variables
- ✘Choosing a method because it's easy, not because it fits the question
- ✘No mention of sample size or selection criteria
- ✘Not accounting for potential sources of error
Evaluator Focus
- Variable definition quality
- Method-problem fit
- Reproducibility
- Bias control
How to Get 5 Points
- ✔Can another student replicate your experiment exactly?
- ✔Are your variables explicitly named and defined?
- ✔Did you explain why you chose this method over alternatives?
- ✔Did you consider potential errors or biases?
Universal Scoring Scale
1
Poor
2
Insufficient
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
←Back to Rubric
Criterion 4 of 20