III · Presentation & Defense
Criterion 11 / 20
20%
Clarity in Oral Communication
Claridad en la Comunicación Oral
We evaluate how clearly, confidently, and effectively the presenter communicates the project verbally to an evaluator panel.
Scoring Breakdown
5
Excellent
- Clear, structured, and confident delivery
- Appropriate pace and volume
- Technical terms explained when used
- Presentation flows naturally — not a reading
- Engages the audience
4
Good
- Generally clear communication
- Structured delivery with minor interruptions
- Mostly independent from slides
- Good but occasional hesitation
3
Acceptable
- Understandable but lacks confidence
- Some reliance on reading from slides/notes
- Pacing issues
- Structure exists but could be clearer
2
Insufficient
- Hard to follow
- Reads directly from notes or slides throughout
- Monotonous delivery
- Unclear or confusing explanations
1
Poor
- Cannot communicate the project
- Completely reads slides
- Audience cannot understand what is being presented
- No preparation evident
Common Mistakes
- ✘Reading word-for-word from slides
- ✘Speaking too fast due to nerves
- ✘Using overly technical vocabulary without explanation
- ✘Facing the screen instead of the audience
Evaluator Focus
- Independence from notes
- Pacing and clarity
- Technical explanation quality
- Audience engagement
How to Get 5 Points
- ✔Practice 5+ times before presentation
- ✔Can you present without looking at the slides?
- ✔Is your speed comfortable for the listener?
- ✔Do you explain every technical term you use?
Universal Scoring Scale
1
Poor
2
Insufficient
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
←Back to Rubric
Criterion 11 of 20