II · Portfolio & Evidence
Criterion 9 / 20
25%
Technical Quality of Prototype (If Applicable)
Calidad Técnica del Prototipo (Si Aplica)
We evaluate the technical soundness, functionality, and quality of the physical, digital, or conceptual prototype presented.
Scoring Breakdown
5
Excellent
- Prototype is fully functional and tested
- Demonstrates core innovation
- Built with appropriate materials or tools
- Documented with technical specifications
- Defensible design decisions
4
Good
- Mostly functional with minor issues
- Good construction quality
- Partially documented
- Design decisions mostly justified
3
Acceptable
- Prototype functions partially
- Basic construction
- Limited documentation
- Some technical decisions unexplained
2
Insufficient
- Prototype is mostly non-functional
- Poor construction quality
- Minimal technical detail
- Does not demonstrate the solution
1
Poor
- No prototype built
- Only sketches or ideas
- Nothing tangible to evaluate
- Purely conceptual without physical evidence
Common Mistakes
- ✘Presenting a 3D render as if it were a real prototype
- ✘Not documenting what materials or technologies were used
- ✘Prototype looks good but doesn't actually work
- ✘No technical specifications provided
Evaluator Focus
- Functionality
- Technical documentation
- Construction quality
- Design justification
How to Get 5 Points
- ✔Can you demonstrate your prototype working live?
- ✔Did you document every major technical decision?
- ✔Is it built with real materials/code (not just a mockup)?
- ✔Can you explain how it works technically?
Universal Scoring Scale
1
Poor
2
Insufficient
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
←Back to Rubric
Criterion 9 of 20