II · Portfolio & Evidence
Criterion 10 / 20
25%
Portfolio Organization and Professionalism
Organización y Profesionalismo del Portafolio
We assess the structure, visual quality, and professionalism of the portfolio as a whole document.
Scoring Breakdown
5
Excellent
- Consistent and professional visual design
- Logical section ordering and navigation
- Academic formatting (fonts, headers, spacing)
- All sections labeled and easy to find
- Professional cover, index, and bibliography
4
Good
- Good visual consistency
- Clear structure
- Most elements formatted professionally
- Minor formatting inconsistencies
3
Acceptable
- Some structure present
- Inconsistent formatting
- Missing index or navigation
- Readable but not polished
2
Insufficient
- Disorganized content
- Mixed fonts and styles
- Hard to navigate
- Missing key sections
1
Poor
- No structure or organization
- Unreadable or chaotic formatting
- Bulk of content thrown together
- No professional presentation effort
Common Mistakes
- ✘Using 5 different fonts in the same document
- ✘No table of contents
- ✘Inconsistent image sizing
- ✘Submitting a disorganized folder instead of a structured portfolio
Evaluator Focus
- Visual consistency
- Structural logic
- Navigability
- Academic presentation standards
How to Get 5 Points
- ✔Does your portfolio look like a professional report?
- ✔Is there a table of contents?
- ✔Are all fonts, colors, and styles consistent?
- ✔Would you be proud to show this to a judge at an international fair?
Universal Scoring Scale
1
Poor
2
Insufficient
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
←Back to Rubric
Criterion 10 of 20