II · Portfolio & Evidence
Criterion 7 / 20
25%
Chronological Development Log
Registro Cronológico del Desarrollo
We evaluate whether the team maintained a structured, chronological record of their development journey, decisions, and milestones.
Scoring Breakdown
5
Excellent
- Complete timeline from start to end of project
- Each entry includes date, activity, and outcome
- Decisions and rationale recorded
- Shows evolution over time clearly
- Includes team member contributions
4
Good
- Most milestones documented
- Mostly chronological
- Decisions partially explained
- Minor time gaps
3
Acceptable
- Basic log present
- Inconsistent dates
- Activities listed without explanation
- Missing key development phases
2
Insufficient
- Sparse or incomplete log
- Hard to follow sequence
- No dates or order
- Minimal entries
1
Poor
- No development log included
- Impossible to trace project history
- No record of process at all
Common Mistakes
- ✘Adding all entries on the last day before submission
- ✘Vague entries like "worked on project"
- ✘No record of decisions or why things changed
- ✘Missing the first weeks entirely
Evaluator Focus
- Chronological integrity
- Decision documentation
- Coverage of full timeline
- Entry quality
How to Get 5 Points
- ✔Does your log cover the entire project duration?
- ✔Does each entry explain what was done AND why?
- ✔Are your entries dated and in order?
- ✔Does someone reading it understand how your project evolved?
Universal Scoring Scale
1
Poor
2
Insufficient
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
←Back to Rubric
Criterion 7 of 20