Home/Evaluation Rubric/Impact & International Projection/Technical Feasibility
IV · Impact & International Projection
Criterion 18 / 20
30%

Technical Feasibility

Viabilidad Técnica

We evaluate whether the proposed solution is realistic to implement given the current technology, resources, and timeline.

Scoring Breakdown

5
Excellent
  • Clear and realistic implementation plan
  • Technology chosen is appropriate and accessible
  • Resources identified and justified
  • Timeline is realistic
  • Risks and mitigations considered
4
Good
  • Generally feasible plan
  • Most resources identified
  • Timeline mostly realistic
  • Basic risk awareness
3
Acceptable
  • Plan described but details missing
  • Some technology or resource gaps
  • Timeline vague
  • Limited risk analysis
2
Insufficient
  • Plan is incomplete or unrealistic
  • Key resources not identified
  • No clear timeline
  • Major feasibility concerns
1
Poor
  • Implementation plan non-existent
  • Completely unrealistic expectations
  • No technology or resource consideration
  • Purely speculative

Common Mistakes

  • Building an AI solution without data or computing resources
  • Estimating 6 months for a project that needs 2 years
  • Not identifying who will build/maintain the solution
  • Assuming everything will work perfectly without contingencies

Evaluator Focus

  • Realism of plan
  • Resource identification
  • Risk consideration
  • Technology appropriateness

How to Get 5 Points

  • Have you identified every resource needed to build it?
  • Is your timeline realistic for your team's capacity?
  • Have you identified at least 3 risks and how you'd handle them?
  • Does the technology you're proposing actually exist and is accessible?

Universal Scoring Scale

1
Poor
2
Insufficient
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
Back to Rubric
Criterion 18 of 20
Technical Feasibility | e‑Xpectrum